-
New Plan Will Let High Schoolers Graduate Early - NYTimes.com
I'm not sure this is the best reasoned argument for early graduation and more, more, and more testing. But it does raise the question - what makes those last two years of high school relevant and worth sticking around for? I'm sure the independent schools in those eight states applying for the grant are wondering the same thing.
Back to the question - what makes the last two years of high school relevant, purposeful, and worth sticking around for? Is the is rigorous curriculum? Is it student life and relationships with teachers? It seems clear that schools must change in order to survive. But how will school thrive? Moving beyond content and testing has to be a first step. Building communities of learners with a shared purpose might be a second step. Revising curriculum and moving toward demonstrations of learning through project-based, real-world work might also be part of the equation. How do others feel about graduation by tenth grade? What can schools, public and private, do to remain relevant?
Thursday, February 18, 2010
New Plan Will Let High Schoolers Graduate Early - NYTimes.com
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Demonstrations of Learning
-
Demonstrations of Learning for 21st-Century Schools
In the Fall issue of Independent School Magazine, Pat Bassett makes a case for "demonstrations of student learning". Would it change outcomes if a teacher asks a student to demonstrate what they know? I think it certainly would. What can you do with what you know in a real-world setting.
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
Pat Bassett writes about "tangible output" in terms of student portfolios and "demonstrations of learning." How would your curriculum change if the assessment was an actual demonstration of a student had learned? Take a look at the list that Bassett and a group of college presidents and school heads put together as demonstrations of learning. What would you include?
Diigo: More Amazing than Ever!
-
ELI 7 Things You Should Know - 57 Resources | EDUCAUSE
tags: 7 Things, blogging, educause, education, web2.0, pedagogy
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
I just figured out how to use "Easy Blog" at Diigo. This tool makes blogging and sharing with your personal learning network amazingly simple. So, you find an article online that excites you, you use your Diigo toolbar to bookmark it, tag it, and save it in the cloud. You add your invitations. Now all you need is a way to invite others into the conversation. Wow.
The resource about is an amazing treasure trove of "7 Things" about back channels, about using ning, about lecture capture, about google apps. Ah, so many things to play with and, yes, so little time.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Conversation over Time: The Rationale for Blogging
Anne Davis wrote two years ago a "A Rationale for Educational Blogging" that gives voice to many of the things I've been feeling on a gut level. The rationale addresses not only what students can gain from blogging, but also exhorts teachers to examine their responsibility for preparing students for the new world of communicating and building their ideas. Davis (no relation, I'm afraid) says, "teachers need to address writing for a public audience, how to cite and link and why, how to use the comment tool in pedagogical ways, how to read web materials more efficiently as well as explore other ways to consider pedagogical uses of blogs. Blogging requires us to teach students to critically engage media. Students need instruction on how to become efficient navigators in these digital spaces where they will be obtaining a majority of their information."
And to her long list of pedagogical reasons for incorporating blogs to help our students learn, I add this comment:
"Wow. You can add another item to your list. This conversation has gone on for 2 years! The ability to build a conversation over time — what a remarkable thing! This reminds me of the wonderful way artists, writers, and thinkers have used letter writing in the past to develop, test, and share their ideas. This makes me feel like I’m part of something huge and historic."
And to her long list of pedagogical reasons for incorporating blogs to help our students learn, I add this comment:
"Wow. You can add another item to your list. This conversation has gone on for 2 years! The ability to build a conversation over time — what a remarkable thing! This reminds me of the wonderful way artists, writers, and thinkers have used letter writing in the past to develop, test, and share their ideas. This makes me feel like I’m part of something huge and historic."
Friday, January 29, 2010
Reading and Writing in the 21st Century
Tomorrow morning I will give a presentation to the Texas Alliance of Accredited Private Schools on the very lofty and all-encompassing topic that I repeat as the title of this blog. I hope to raise some questions and stir some discussion about how our students actually go about the business of reading and writing as they learn. I will ask some very simple questions.
What's the difference between reading a paperback copy of Jane Eyre, a digital text of the novel, or the digital text of the novel marked up in Diigo and shared with "friends" on Facebook? What's the difference between writing a standard critical analysis of the novel on a word processor and sharing ideas about the novel (with hyperlinks, images, and comments) in a blog? I ultimately ask, partly rhetorically and partly probing for deeper answers, why do we still teach in just one way with these developments in mind. How are we serving our students? What do we owe them as they negotiate these new tools on their own?
I still have a stack of paperback books by my bedside (and a pen to mark them up), but I am also excited by the possibilities for reading and writing suggested by the new iPad. I don't have to settle for just one, do I?
What's the difference between reading a paperback copy of Jane Eyre, a digital text of the novel, or the digital text of the novel marked up in Diigo and shared with "friends" on Facebook? What's the difference between writing a standard critical analysis of the novel on a word processor and sharing ideas about the novel (with hyperlinks, images, and comments) in a blog? I ultimately ask, partly rhetorically and partly probing for deeper answers, why do we still teach in just one way with these developments in mind. How are we serving our students? What do we owe them as they negotiate these new tools on their own?
I still have a stack of paperback books by my bedside (and a pen to mark them up), but I am also excited by the possibilities for reading and writing suggested by the new iPad. I don't have to settle for just one, do I?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)